BRI Fact Sheet

375 trainees participated in the BRI Program in 2018, 331participated in 2017, and 385participated in the 2016 program.

52 faculty and post-docs volunteered their time in 2018 to lead 82 discussion groups 

2018 BRI OVERALL LECTURE SUMMARY

 

 

Conflict

Data

Peer

Research Misconduct

Responsible Authorship

N/A

4.53

5.53

4.71

4.59

lecture cancelled

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

Scale of 1-6 (1=lowest; 6=highest) 

 

The lecture as a whole was:

 

The relevance and usefulness of the lecture content were: 

 

The speaker's contribution to the lecture content was: 

 

The speaker stimulated interest in the topic: 

The lecture as a whole was: 

     

N/A

4.38

5.38

4.71

4.68

The relevance and usefulness of the lecture content were:

 

N/A

4.50

5.56

4.36

4.50

The speaker's contribution to the lecture content was:

 

N/A

4.75

5.75

4.93

4.61

The speaker stimulated interest in the topic:

   

N/A

4.50

5.44

4.86

4.57

 

2018 OVERALL DISCUSSION GROUP SUMMARY:

 

*The discussion group format was effective

4.51

*The discussion leader was informed

4.68

*The discussion leader was a helpful and effective facilitator

4.64

*The material presented was interesting to me

4.38

*The material was relevant and useful to my field or specific needs

4.35

*The cases elicited productive discussion.

4.47

*The discussion brought out important ethical issues related to the topic

4.53

*I felt comfortable participating in this discussion.

4.63

*Most participants contributed adequately to the discussion.

4.39

*Most participants were prepared to participate in the discussion

4.43

Scale of 1-5 (5 being highest)

Most of the 668 participants provided feedback. These data show that the discussion groups
were very well received by the trainees: the average score for each question requiring numerical
feedback averaged over 4.5 on a 5.0 scale.