Discussion Don's case illustrates three key points in the application of growth charts to adolescents whose weight fluctuates during adolescence: 1.
Don's goal of weighing 155 lbs at 71 inches would result in a BMI of 21.6.
This would be a "healthier" BMI than he had at 13 years of age
(170 lbs and 66 inches: BMI 27.5). However, the way in which an obese
individual reduces his/her high BMI-for-age must be examined closely,
and every effort should be made to maintain the lower BMI-for-age once
it is attained.
2. Because the formula for BMI (weight in kg / [stature in m]2) does not consider body composition, athletes who have a higher than average amount of lean body mass (muscle) may have a higher than expected BMI, without being obese. This could result in a "false positive" label of obesity when using BMI-for-age cutoffs. However, it is usually possible to identify, on physical examination, adolescents whose high BMI is due to extreme muscularity rather than excessive fat tissue. The use of triceps skinfold thickness in this situation can help confirm the clinical impression of normal body fat stores (Himes, 1989). This underscores
the importance of applying the CDC growth charts to individuals in the
context of their history and physical examination. It is even possible
for adolescent athletes to have a high BMI-for-age and a low
body fat, especially if they are using anabolic steroids. 3.
Previous growth charts ended at 18 years of age. The inclusion of population
standards up to age 20, including BMI-for-age charts, is a major advantage
of the new CDC charts. However, it is important to keep in mind that the
new BMI-for-age charts are still based on population-level data, and the
pattern of an individual youth's BMI time may not follow the smooth percentile
curves depicted on the charts. |